KETAHANAN TENAGA KESEHATAN DALAM TRANSFORMASI DIGITAL RUMAH SAKIT PERAN KEPEMIMPINAN ADAPTIF, KEAMANAN PSIKOLOGIS, DAN KESEJAHTERAAN PROFESIONAL

Authors

  • Lizani Lizani Akademi Administrasi Rumah Sakit Mataram
  • Yunita Yunita Akademi Administrasi Rumah Sakit Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55681/aohj.v3i4.600

Keywords:

Workforce Resilience, Adaptive Leadership, Psychological Safety

Abstract

The digital transformation of hospitals reshapes service systems, clinical coordination, documentation, and the patterns of interaction among healthcare professionals. While these changes offer greater efficiency, they also impose pressures related to adaptation, cognitive load, and professional uncertainty. This article aims to develop a conceptual framework for the resilience of healthcare professionals by examining the interrelationships between adaptive leadership, psychological safety, and professional well-being within the context of hospital technology implementation. The study employs an integrative literature review, utilizing a thematic synthesis of scientific publications, guidelines from health organizations, and relevant organizational behavior theories. The analysis maps out mechanisms such as leadership support, the courage to report errors, work autonomy, learning capacity, and the management of digital work demands. The synthesis suggests that adaptive leadership can strengthen resilience through effective communication regarding change, participatory decision-making, and the adjustment of resources. Psychological safety is identified as a condition that enables healthcare professionals to report technological obstacles, seek assistance, and learn without the fear of humiliation. Professional well-being is understood both as an outcome and as a resource that sustains engagement, safety, and the continuity of care. The proposed framework connects these three factors through team learning processes and the balancing of work demands against available resources. As this article does not involve statistical testing or primary data collection, no definitive causal relationships can be established. Its contribution lies in the formulation of research propositions, measurement indicators, and implementation recommendations that can be tested through longitudinal, multi-hospital studies. Emphasis is placed on ensuring equitable evaluation across different professions, protecting the confidentiality of reporting, and involving staff in the design of systems. These conceptual findings can serve as a foundation for developing human-centered digital transformation policies—moving beyond mere technology procurement—and can support future empirical research in Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

Edmondson, A. C., & Bransby, D. P. (2023). Psychological safety comes of age: Observed themes in an established literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217

Sinsky, C. A., et al. (2022). Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: A time and motion study in 4 specialties. Annals of Internal Medicine, 165(11), 753–760. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-0961

West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2018). Physician burnout: Contributors, consequences and solutions. Journal of Internal Medicine, 283(6), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12752

Shanafelt, T. D., West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., et al. (2022). Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life integration in physicians during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 97(12), 2248–2258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.09.002

Melnick, E. R., et al. (2020). The association between perceived electronic health record usability and professional burnout among US physicians. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 95(3), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.09.024

Carayon, P., et al. (2020). Advancing a sociotechnical systems approach to workplace safety. Applied Ergonomics, 88, 103166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103166

Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413

Dyrbye, L. N., et al. (2017). Burnout among health care professionals: A call to explore and address this underrecognized threat to safe, high-quality care. NAM Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.31478/201707b

Greenhalgh, T., et al. (2017). Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(11), e367. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8775

Cresswell, K., & Sheikh, A. (2013). Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: An interpretative review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(5), e73–e86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.007

Holden, R. J., et al. (2013). SEIPS 2.0: A human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics, 56(11), 1669–1686. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.838643

Tawfik, D. S., et al. (2019). Evidence relating health care provider burnout and quality of care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 171(8), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-1152

Panagioti, M., et al. (2017). Controlled interventions to reduce burnout in physicians: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7674

Sexton, J. B., et al. (2006). The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: Psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-44

Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174

Lesener, T., Gusy, B., & Wolter, C. (2019). The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work & Stress, 33(1), 76–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065

World Health Organization. (2022). WHO guidelines on mental health at work. World Health Organization. https://doi.org/10.4060/9789240053052

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Lizani, L., & Yunita, Y. (2025). KETAHANAN TENAGA KESEHATAN DALAM TRANSFORMASI DIGITAL RUMAH SAKIT PERAN KEPEMIMPINAN ADAPTIF, KEAMANAN PSIKOLOGIS, DAN KESEJAHTERAAN PROFESIONAL. Aspiration of Health Journal, 3(4), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.55681/aohj.v3i4.600